Does this Barack Obama birth certificate issue bug you because, although improbable, it's possible that he's not a natural born citizen, isn't eligible to be President under the Constitution, and this issue could be bigger than Watergate -- or any other "gate" in history?This is more than just an opinion piece, the argument is laid out quite nicely.
Are you afraid that if you were even to raise the subject with your friends that they will think you wear a tinfoil hat, because Factcheck.org, the final arbiter of truth in the universe, said so?
...
This is about the validity of our constitution, not Barack Obama. Blame Democrats for not flushing this out before hand.
3 comments:
The scariest thing about this issue is the amount of acclaim and power he has been given. I have no doubt that the illuminati that loves him so much could manufacture a real-looking birth certificate.. or prevent the issue from ever being addressed. He SHOULD have had to present it before he was able to have his name on presidential ballots.
...and he did. It is just that some people don't seem to believe it was presented.
from the article linked in my post...
Had he disclosed his vault copy in the Berg v. Obama lawsuit (which was the first lawsuit filed on the question of his eligibility to be President), and it was established he was born in Hawaii, that would have constituted res judicata, and acted to stop other similar lawsuits being filed.
Without res judicata (meaning, the matter is adjudged and settled conclusively) he or government officials will need to defend other lawsuits, and valuable court resources will be expended.
...summary, no, he didn't produce a thing, unless you have something the courts don't have, yet.
Post a Comment