Showing posts with label Iraq surge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Iraq surge. Show all posts

January 18, 2009

Thank You W


Eight years in a nutshell...

Selected, not elected
Though not one recount nor independent assessment could change the tally in favor of Al Gore, President Bush's tenure got off to a rocky start as the contested 2000 campaign lasted weeks beyond election day, until the US Supreme Court stopped the Florida court's rule-changing attempts.

9-11-2001
The moment will define Bush like no other - the President on the bullhorn. "Those responsible for taking down these buildings... will hear from all of us soon." On 9-12-2001 we were a different country than the day before...today, we couldn't be further removed from the 9-12 mentality. Never forget? Hmmm.

Afghanistan
The battle was quick and decisive. Hamid Karzai won the first Afghan democratic elections in decades soon after. While capturing Bin-Laden never happened, his influence was marginalized through the rest of Bush's years; reduced to caveman videos threatening Jihad, with little actual impact.

Iraq
...was necessary, despite a lack of WMD's. Saddam's influence and willingness to fund anyone who wished to do the west harm, not to mention his decade-long dodging of UN mandates, made it necessary to remove him before he facilitated the next 9/11. The WMD's were most likely moved out (to Syria) in the many years prior to the invasion.

The Democrat's antagonistic focus against Bush's actions in Iraq ended the traditional politics ending at the water's edge; war became a pawn of politics. When Bush called for the surge, critics claimed it was too late; it would never work, the war was lost. Of course, it worked tremendously. Today Iraq is an ally, a friend in a critical region of the world.

He couldn't say it early in the Iraq war, but Iran was Bush's real focus. Hussein was a nuisance, a distraction, a set up for the real target. Iran is the head of the snake; the root of the Islamic revolution with their hands so close to dangerous weaponry. Today, Iran is teetering on their own economic collapse and ripe for revolution.

Social Security
Before the housing collapse, this was the prevalent pending economic crisis everyone knew about. But just like the warnings preceding the sub-prime mortgage mess, this issue was dead before Bush ever got it off the ground. The failure to capitalize on his "political capital" set the tone for a disappointing second term.

Taxes
It was his first political victory, when most experts said he couldn't do it following the aftermath of the 2000 election. The cuts worked as they always do, bringing in more revenue. As usual, increased government spending, including Bush's own proposals (Medicare, the bailout), squandered the increased revenue and lead to ballooning deficit spending.

No Child Left Behind
This is what happens when Ted Kennedy writes legislation...this is what happens when Republicans "reach across the aisle".

Katrina
24 hours. Had FEMA been engaged 24 hours earlier, the blame Bush received following this disaster would have never reached the heights it did. In reality, Bush didn't see the utter incompetence of Mayor Nagen and Governor Blanco, neither of whom had an adequate plan in place for such a crisis.

Immigration
This is where Bush lost most conservatives, including myself. His insistence that "comprehensive immigration reform" happen before the border was secure differed with many who had defended the President positions previously. It was not consistent with his own stated policy to keep us safe, first and foremost.

The Economy
Bush inherited a mini-recession, endured a major terrorist attack which temporarily crashed the markets, and survived accounting scandals which rocked the financial industry. Still, the economy hummed along. Employment reached 'full' capacity; those who wanted to work could and did.

Then the impact of 30 years of bad public policy (the sub-prime mortgage ponzie scheme) crashed the housing industry in late 2008. The banks who loaned the money needed bailouts and Bush blinked, much to the chagrin of many common sense thinking Americans who lived their lives within their means. The bailouts amounted to one of the largest transfers of private wealth to government control.

Compassionate Conservative
I believe Rush Limbaugh once said, compassionate conservatism is a redundant phrase. Whether he did or not isn't important; conservatism IS compassion. Bush's definition of his type of conservatism should have been a sign a his conservative-socialistic views.
-------

Final thoughts...
Ultimately, Bush was conservative with most of his defense/foreign policy. With the exception of immigration, he fought hard to maintain this country's security. Despite what the left wants us to believe regarding Abu-Grab, Guantanamo, and wiretaps, Bush should be proud of the job he's done. We haven't had a significant attack on American soil since September 11th. Much of what he has done will be followed by the new administration.

Had Democrats not been so hell bent on politicizing the war, the focus in 2003 and 2005 could have been on the pending sub-prime crisis. You know, the one Democrats said wasn't a crisis. Today I wonder if that wasn't done purposely.

But Bush was more socialist with his domestic agenda. Big government now controls more of our education system and our banks. His failure to reform Social Security, the increasing size of medicare, and the current economic crisis means the next generation is left with a big tab to pay.

It's not solely the fault of his policies. In fact, his tax cuts may have forestalled the inevitable economic crisis. But the knee-jerk acceptance of Hank Paulson's remedy was a major failure of vision on his part.

Thank you President Bush. You kept us safe. You took the fight to the enemy despite ridiculous obstacles from your political opponents.

Thank you for following through on your promise to cut taxes. But your failure to curtail spending by Republicans when they were in control, and Democrats when they got it back, will haunt our party for a generation or more. With you as the party's main personality, the GOP has lost any gains they earned in '94.

It was difficult for supporters like me to listen to you give a speech. Though you were right on most issues, your inability to communicate a clear message with out the annoying winks, smirks, and Bush-isms meant a lot of good legislation never saw the light of day.

Thank you Mr. President for the bailouts. Not wanting people to suffer on your watch, as we would have if the bailouts hadn't been rushed through, is not compassionate conservatism, it's soft socialism.

Finally Mr. President, you have one bit of unfinished business. You must commute the sentences of Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean. If you fail to do so, you lose any semblance of real compassion and judgment.
-------

Never in human history has one man endured more scrutiny, ridicule, and vile commentary as Dubya has over the last eight years. His critics needed to stoop to unbelievable depths in attempts to destroy him. Several times, he was considered politically dead.

In fact, Bush was a survivor. He was focused, determined, and committed.

His biggest flaw was well known - he was not good on camera; he was not the Great Communicator. He bumbled and blundered his way to soft-ball criticism. W was an easy target.

But he took it all in stride. He never let them see him sweat. He believed when no one else would. He was sincere, genuine, and believed in his country.

Would I vote for him again? Yes! He still was a much better choice than either Gore or Kerry, period.

How will history judge him? I suspect better than the MSM morons who report and comment on the news today.

September 2, 2008

Son of a...

More bad news for Democrats.

Let me decipher for you. It's good news for the country.

Here's how Democrats Joe Biden, Harry Reid, John Murtha, Jim Webb, Chuck Schumer, saw the issue...

And my personal favorite, Keith Olbermann with a 10-plus minute Special Comment when Bush announced the surge.



...it's special alright!

And yet today, Olbermann feels he's credible enough to scrutinize Sarah Palin's resume? I guess ESPN knew what kind of fraud they were letting go.

September 1, 2007

Reality Check?


Here's is a perfect example of what anti-war voters, who think their issue sent Patrick Murphy to Congress in 2006, get from their representative long after the results were tabulated.

''They can be adamant, but they have to understand reality," Ceisler said of the anti-war activists. "In terms of Patrick's election, where are they going to go? He's as good as they get on the issue. There are pockets of those people in Bucks County, but nothing that makes a big difference."

- Larry Ceisler Democrat Strategist Philadelphia

Ah, reality, that's the key. But what reality could Dems be hiding from their supporters? Reality that the surge is working? Reality that no matter how much Dems talked about how the election was a "mandate" to brings our troops home, there was never any intention to do so? Reality that the Democrats know they can't tell the President what to do with his troops?

Or is it that the donkeys will dance around the realities in Iraq to appease the hard-left, anti-war lunatics that they believe helped them get elected? Only to then turn around and talk of them as outliers in the political spectrum, because they know Democrat voters "have nowhere else to go". Or perhaps it's the knowledge, the REALITY, that talking like an anti-war hippie of the sixties, in Southeastern Pennsylvania, will result in a one-term run for Democrats like Murphy?

And here I thought the "most honest,ethical, and transparent Congress in history" - Nancy Pelosi - had a mandate. Or was that just not realistic?

It seems to me that Congressman Murphy and Democrats everywhere, like all good used car salesmen, have sold their anti-war supporters a lemon.

I have an answer to Mr. Ceisler's question. The Democrat's hard-core-leftist supporters will stay home, if the donkeys fail to bring the troops home ...that's where they'll go. Sweet dreams Patrick!



July 24, 2007

Connecting Dots


First, why won't any news organization, local or otherwise, tell this story?




___________________________________

To summarize the piece...

The surge is working despite countless news stories telling us the exact opposite over the last two weeks. So what could be the reason for this? Why would US Military success be stifled?

Instead, the local networks, took the time to inform us about Cindy -arrest-Cheney-first- Sheehan's visit to Philadelphia today. She is here to announce her candidacy to oust Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and to enlighten us about her plans to impeach Bush.

If it weren't so blatant an attempt by the hit-n-run-locals to tell half of the story, one might confuse it with journalism. But it follows a very familiar pattern to anyone who has studied news coverage of the Vietnam War.

First, you stifle any military success by our guys. Next, make sure you cover any anti-war opinion poll, statement, or activity so it appears the public is against the war effort. Throw in the opinions of politicians who call for withdrawal; claiming we've lost.

The final piece of the puzzle during Nixon's years, of course was Watergate. The break-in and cover-up distracted Nixon at a time when some Vietnam historians think the war had turned in our favor. So far, Bush hasn't had his "I'm not a crook" moment. Not that there hasn't been several attempts to find one.

This is why Democrats (and hopeful Dems like Sheehan) tried to tell us that Bush lied about WMD's; why they blew the terrorist surveillance program out of proportion; and why they called the surge a failure, one month after it was at full strength.

However, the real attempt to find the Watergate moment, was what turned into the Scooter Libby case. Here, CIA non-covert agent Valerie Plame, sent her husband (Joe Wilson) over to Africa to dispute claims Bush made that Iraq sought uranium from North Africa. When the connection between the couple was told to Robert Novak (by Richard Armitage), the Bush White House (Cheney, Rove, et al) was accused for outing a covert agent. Had that actually been the case, the final piece of the Vietnam media template would have been complete.

So it starts with selective news coverage which distorts what's happening. The goal is to create the perception that we are failing, again. It repeats the predictable emotional responses of uninformed (isn't that convenient?) news viewers. It aims to build a consensus that wouldn't exist if the entire story were told. It's déjà vu all over.

Hey Philly, wake up, your being force-fed propaganda, again.